Environmental Science students visit the city’s water filtration plant in Holden, MA. Pictures above display i) the role that computers play in monitoring and managing each treatment step, ii) plant manager Bob Hoyt fielding a question from upper school science teacher ,Paul Elkins – in the room for coagulation (fast mixing of aluminum sulfate and cationic polymer binds to debris, forming flocs, which after going through slow mixing, or flocculation, will be filtered out by the top layer of the direct filtration beds (comprised of 5 feet coal, 1 foot sand, 1 foot gravel) and de-ozonation (excess ozone needs to be converted back to O2 before being released outside)- and iii) students peering over the direct filtration beds (filtering water at a rate of about 6 gallons/sf/minute). Typically, the plant reaches it annual maximum during the summer, with 32+ MGD, well below its maximum capacity of 50 +MGD. If and when a water main breaks, the plant will have to compensate for the water pressure drop and lost water by increasing filtration rates by a few MGD. The city is working to mitigate the contamination threat from “cross connections” which is when non-potable water (contaminated with pesticides, chlorine, industrial materials, etc.) back-flows into the water distribution systems due to negative pressure. For more information click on the Water page above and previous water post

Alta Vista Buffalo Farm

November 25, 2008

At the Alta Vista Buffalo Farm located in Rutland, MA and the Nashua River Watershed, students observed and discussed elements of sustainable agriculture: transparency, community-centered, grass-fed, improved nutrition (iron, lower cholesterol, higher protein), animal welfare, “nature’s pattern”, solarized systems, rotational grazing, symbiotic mutualism, etc. Students also discussed the the drastic population changes of the American Buffalo and its genetic dilution. Last, the farm is located in a hill overlooking the Pine-Hill Reservoir, one of ten reservoirs that supplies Worcester and surrounding towns with municipal water. First barrier protection buffer zones are pronounced in the form of tree stands, and distance from roads, while various brooks flow undeneath rodes and from farm land (such as Alta Vista). Pine Hill is the largest of the ten holding approximately 3 billion gallons at an elevation of 900 feet.

The Environmental Science class returned for the second year in a row to look first-hand at how a local small family dairy farm operates. About 40-50 cows produce up to 8 gallons/day each. Raised on pasture (80 acres on site, 200+ for hay off-site) and farm grown corn (35 acres) as well as imported grain mix (3 tons/week). Cows can eat corn (all of the plant) fresh or fermented but not while it is fermenting (a “hot ration”). A last detail added on this trip were soil types (”merrimack” to the west, “paxton” on the drumlin farm site, and “situate” to the east). Students learned how the sustainable versus industrial agriculture debate is rarely an either-or scenario but a spectrum, or more aptly a series of spectrums for each practice element.

Nicewicz Farm

November 25, 2008

Environmental students travelled to the 30-acre, third generation Nicewicz Farm located on 100 acres of land in Bolton, MA and the Nashua River Watershed. At 1200 trees putting out about 4,000 bushels (40lbs/bushel)/year, apple trees are the farm’s dominant crop. A non-native species, apple trees are easy prey for pests such as the the apple maggot, leaf miner, apple scab, and plum curculio and so require pesticide management. The Nicewicz Farm has implemented Integrated Pest Management (IPM) – a method of monitoring pest life cycles, population density, etc. and utilizing traps to optimize the effectiveness and minimize the amount of species-targeted pesticide applications. As a result Nicewicz uses 75% less pesticides compared to the older technique of broad spectrum pesticide applications. The farm also reminds us of the diversity of apple varieties: their 17 to the 1,000’s that exist worldwide.

Buffone Garden Day 2

September 23, 2008

WA Environmental Science students spent a second class period harvesting crops and preparing the local Buffone Garden for winter. There was a surprised siting of a hawk atop of Rader (photo below)

Creating urban gardens for food production is a potentially transformative act in terms of community building, broad and dynamic virtues of cultivating growth, decreasing carbon emissions and run-off pollution, and biological/ecological field study opportunities, among other benefits.

Neighborhood Garden Work

September 17, 2008

Environmental Science students from the class of 2012 spent the morning harvesting crops from the Charlie Buffone Garden on Aetna street. The garden is a community garden managed by Oak Hill CDC. Produce from the garden is donated to neighborhood residence.This past summer members of the WA community tended to the garden and ES students will spend some time here harvesting as well as using the garden as a means for studying agriculture in Massachusetts. Soil for the garden came from Worcester residents’ yard compost, which is formed at the Worcester Recycling Center on Ballard street. The class has asked the question what can be grown in state? On Aetna street tomatoes, corn, squash, beans, peppers, cabbage, eggplant, lettuce, pumpkin, cucumber, herbs, and more can grow. What nutrients do these foods supply? What are the benefits of planting corn, beans, and squash together? Where did this practice originate and why? What conditions are needed for the plants to grow? What type of soil? The soil for the garden came from Worcester residents’ yard compost, which is formed at the Worcester Recycling Center on Ballard street. Climate change has been addressed as a major environmental concern by the class, how does producing food in this manner effect carbon dioxide emissions (the primary green house gas -GHG-), aslo known as our carbon footprint. Click on the agriculture page above for more information on agriculture and the lessons the Buffone Garden has to offer.

The Whitin Mill (built in 1826) rising up along the Mumford river- tributary to the 45 mile long Blackstone River-has recently been transformed, along with three adjacent buildings including an old forge with an intact foundation from 1772, through a five year sustainable renovation project led by Alternatives. True to the spirit of innovation that drove the Whitin Mill to become the worlds leader in textile machinery manufacturing (cotton spinning rings produced through the 1970’s) Alternatives has delievered a green, “social capital” rich complex comprised of a theater, offices, art studio space, apartments, and a restaurant. 100% of HVAC demand will come from 5 geothermal wells dug down 1500 feet to 52 degree F water, saving $60,000/year in heating/cooling costs. Power for the buildings will be provided by solar and hydro power. 5% of the property’s 240,000 kW-hr annual demand will come from 32 solar panels (12,000 kW-hrs a year) while the remaining 80% will come from a soon to be completed 37 kW hydro turbine (320 kW-hrs/year) which will sell power at night back to the power company translating in savings of over $30,000 from unpaid utility bills and an additional $12,000+ from selling back to the grid.

Picture Picture

95 % of the materials from the site were recycled, including the use of a diseased tulip tree that was cut and boarded for use as sound control panels in the theater. Built wood parts were routinely reused for flooring and the deck of the plaza is made from recycled plastic-wood composite. Take a tour yourself, it is an inspired work for an inspiring future, especially for the slumbering Blackstone Valley.

For more information go to http://www.telegram.com/article/20080422/NEWS/804220498

and http://www.alternativesnet.org/whitin_mill_restoration.asp

Andrew McManus, METECH GENERAL MANGER, displays a curcuit board.

The WA Environmental Science classes travelled about a mile from school, just across the start of the Blackstone River along route 146, to the Metech International facility (www.metech-arm.com) in order to learn about the  scale (1,000,000 lbs/month) and  3 tier process of recycling electronic waste (reuse, recovery, and reclamation) at Metech.

In 2005, 20-50 million tons of “e-srap” (anything with a chord) were produced in worldwide. In 2007 the US e-scrapped 500 million personal computers. Metech processes electronic equipment for metal reclamation (gold, platinum, silver to copper and aluminum, etc.), while sending off plastics, cardboard, and toxic heavy metals such cadmium and mercury for recycling and/or hazardous waste handling.

For Flow Charts of recycling process click below:

material-flow-no-animation-no-1

material-flow-no-animation-no-2

material-flow-no-animation-no-3

The Nuclear Option

March 6, 2008

seabrook-nuclearwicasett.jpgvermont-yankee.jpgvermont-yankee-spent-fuel.jpg

Worcester Academy gets approximately 27% – as compared to a 20% national average- of its electricity from nuclear energy: fission of 2-3% enriched Uranium-235.

The benefits of nuclear are the enormous amount of energy that fissionable U-235 releases. One gram of U-235 (depending on enrichment level) produce the same amount of heat energy as burning 6,000 pounds of coal when used to heat water into steam which in turn spins a turbine to generate electricity. Further, there are no greenhouse gas emissions, electricity can be produced cheaply (though this could be argued against given special insurance policies for nuclear and unsettled costs for nuclear waste management), and in theory nuclear fuel can be reprocessed many times over. Capacity of New England nuclear reactor plants (see photo) is as follows:

Location- Name- Capacity
Maine- Wiscasett Maine Yankee (closed) 850 MW
CT- Haddam Neck Plant (closed) 590 MW
Millstone Nuclear Niantic Bay, Waterford (unit
closed) 652 MW
Unit 2 900MW
Unit 3 1200 MW
VT- Vermont Yankee, Vernon, VT 540 MW
NH- Seabrook Nuclear Station, Seabrook, NH 1200 MW*
MA- Yankee Nuclear, Rowe, MA (closed) 185 MW*
Plymouth Station, Plymouth, MA 655MW
Approximate Total: 4,500 MW (operating)

However, reprocessing fuel is dangerous (particularly if spent plutonium is involved, which can be isolated easily using chemical means to make a bomb but is rare in the US for energy production) and there are currently no operating reprocessing plants in the United States. Complications with nuclear energy also include managing nuclear waste which contains lethal and carcinogenic radioactive materials with half lives ranging from a few dats to 10’s of 1,000’s of years [Pu-239:1/2 life=24,360 years: alpha emissions, cocentrates in bones/lings, Sr-90: 1/2 life= 28.8 years: beta emissions: concentrates in bone and teeth, I-131: 1/2 life=8days: beta and gamma: thyroid, Cs-137:1/2life=30 years: beta and gamma: whole body] The many waste products of nuclear fission, such as these, must be handled without mistake and need to be stored securely for 100,000’s of years. Current solutions have included underground storage in geological stable caves. Currently there are over 50,000 metric tons of nuclear waste in the U.S., ( click for details: us-nuclear-waste.pdf ) most of which is stored in water pools on-site of the power plants (see Yankee Rowe photo). Over 3,000 tons of waste is stored in New England Power Nuclear Power Plants (see photos).

ct-yankee-plymouth.jpg3-mile.jpgtrojan-reactor-core.jpg

Some point out the security issues of transporting the waste through highway, water, and railway to waste collection sites such as the proposed Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Studies have, also, shown and critics point out ways that nuclear plants are not secure form terrorist attacks.

For further explanation and more information on nuclear science click on MITcourse nuclear info.jpg

Many scientists studying energy supply and climate change remediation insist that nuclear power needs to be part of the solution.

Essential questions:

1) How many nuclear power plants would need to be built to meet increasing world energy demands and after the end of oil?

2. What is the risk analysis for nuclear fuel procurement and waste production management, transportation, as well as attacks on nuclear facilities? What are the realities and complexities of storing nuclear waste?

3. What is the economic structure and conditions for past, current, and future nuclear power plants?

4. What are the numbers for the world’s current nuclear fuel sources? What will they be in the future?

5. What impact does uranium mining and reprocessing have on the environment, workers, etc.?

6. What % of efficiency as a resource unto itself would be needed to replace the use of nuclear, how could this number be achieved?

WA Fossil Fuel Heating System

February 21, 2008

coal-train-beds.jpgwwii-boiler.jpgold-steam-pipes.jpg

Up until the 1970’s WA heated its campus by burning coal in a 1940 model boiler (middle photo above) located underneath the Megaron. Water was boiled into steam and pumped through large pipes (top right) throughout all of campus. This centralized heating system lost vast amounts of heat energy during transfer through contact with the cold earth, and by burning coal, the dirtiest of the three major fossil fuels, emitted carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carcinogenic hydrocarbons and particulate matter, mercury, and arsenic.

WA used the same boiler when it switched over to heating oil #6, a thick high sulfur content fuel.
At some point in the 1990’s WA began decentralizing its heating system, placing gas boilers (below middle) in each building. Cleaner less polluting natural gas is burned to heat up water which is then pumped (photo of motors, below right) in pipes throughout the building in the form of hot water rather than steam. In 2003, WA installed oil #2 (lower sulfur content) boilers (below left) to replace the old Megaron boiler, the only campus system burning oil.

meagaron-oil-boiler.jpgdexter-gas-boilers.jpgdexter-heating-motors.jpg

WA typically burns up to 35,000 gallons of oil #2 to heat Walker, Megaron and Adams Hall, and 176,000 therms of gas for all buildings on campus.